Welcome to SCIRE Professional

In individuals with cervical spine injury who do not appear to have significant instability, the surgeon may choose to perform an expansile laminoplasty instead of a laminectomy. This surgical option has been proposed for individuals with pre-existing cervical stenosis and who may have central cord syndrome after trauma. However, the procedure is far more commonly used in the treatment of chronic cervical myelopathy and especially for individuals with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.

Table 13. Laminoplasty

Author Year
Research Design

Total Sample Size
Uribe et al. (2005)


Case Control



Population: Median age=56 yr, Time between injury and surgery=3 days.

Intervention: Retrospective review of individuals with acute traumatic central cord syndrome (underlying cervical spondylosis and stenosis) who underwent expansile cervical laminoplasty (n=15; ASIA C=8 and D=7) or not (n=14)

Outcome Measures: ASIA score preoperatively, postoperatively, and at 3 mo, complications.


1.     There were no cases of immediate postoperative deterioration or at 3 mo follow-up.

2.      Neurological outcome: 71.4% (10/14) of individuals improved 1 ASIA grade when examined 3 mo post injury.

Ghasemi et al. (2016)





Population: individuals with Cervical Spinal Cord Injury without instability, spinal cord contusion in magnetic resonance image (MRI), spinal cord compression rate more than 20%, neurologic deficit American Spinal Cord Injury Association ([ASIA] scale from A to D), and follow-up of at least 12 mo.

Intervention: cervical laminoplasty (Hirabayashi Technique)

Outcome Measures: Preoperative neurological state, clinical outcome, and neurological function were measured using the ASIA impairment scale, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) grading scale, and Hirabayashi recovering rate

1.     Thirty-three (80.4%) individuals showed improvement in ASIA grade at 12-month follow-up.

2.     Four (9.7%) individuals in ASIA Grade A and 4 (9.7%) individuals in ASIA Grade D remain unchanged.

3.     The mean JOA score improved from 8.4 ± 6.1 points preoperatively to 11.2 ± 5.4 points at 12 mo postoperatively.

4.     Improvement in JOA was statistically significant (P < 0.05).

5.     Those with cervical stenosis had better recovery than those with OPLL

Gu et al. (2014)
Case Series
Population: All individuals had ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL).

Group L (n=31): Mean age: 65.7 yr; Gender: males=25, females=6; Injury etiology: Falls (n=21, 68%), Traffic accident (n=7, 23%), Sports (n=3, 9%); Level of injury: Cervical; Level of severity: ASIA B=9, C=16, D=6; Mean time since injury: 3.3 days.

Group C (n=29): Mean age: 66.2 yr; Gender: males=24, females=5; Injury etiology: falls=19, traffic accidents=9, sports=1; Level of injury: Cervical; Level of severity: ASIA B=7, C=15, D=7.

Intervention: Individuals that underwent laminoplasty (Group L) were compared to those that refused laminoplasty and underwent conservative treatment (Group C). Outcomes were assessed at admission, discharge, 6 mo and final visit (not specified).

Outcome Measures: American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS), 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36), Ossified levels of OPLL, Thickness of OPLL, Canal diameter, Occupation ratio, Lordosis angle, Range of motion (ROM), High signal intensity levels.

1.     Motor and sensory scores on AIS were significantly higher in Group L than Group C at all assessments (p<0.05).

2.     The only components of SF-36 that significantly improved in Group L at discharge compared to admission were bodily pain and mental health (p<0.05).

3.     There were significant differences in all subscales of SF-36 between Group L and Group C at all postoperative assessments (p<0.05).

4.     Occupation ratio and canal diameter of OPLL was significantly improved in Group L compared to Group C at all postoperative assessments (p<0.05).

5.     High signal intensity levels were significantly better in Group L than Group C from 6 mo onwards (p<0.05).

6.     No significant between-group differences were found for OPLL ossification levels, OPLL thickness, lordosis angle, or ROM (p>0.05).

Kawaguci et al. (2014)
Case Series
NInitial=144, NFinal=124
Population: Mean age: 59.6 yr; Gender: males=102, females=42; Injury etiology: ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL); Level of injury: cervical.

Intervention: Individuals underwent a C3-C7 laminoplasty with posterior decompression surgery (PDS). Anterior decompressive surgery (ADS) was required in 11 cases following PDS. Individuals that received only PDS were compared to those that required ADS following PDS. All individuals used a sternal-occipital-mandibular immobilizer (SOMI) brace or neck collar postoperative for up to 1 mo. Outcomes were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at the following time points: 1 mo, 6 mo, 1 yr, 3 yr, 5 yr, 10 yr, >10 yr.

Outcome Measures: Modified Japanese orthopedic association (JOA) score, Rate of recovery, PDS occupying ratio, PDS cervical alignment, Symptoms of ADS.

1.     Overall, motor and sensory function of the upper and lower extremities on JOA was significantly improved following laminoplasty (all p<0.001).

2.     Bladder function and trunk sensory function on JOA also improved following laminoplasty (both p<0.001).

3.     Long term, JOA rapidly improved up until 5 yr follow-up (average 45% to 60%), and then deteriorated slightly by 10 yr (55%).

4.     Following ADS, all individuals improved in JOA scores and had a mean recovery rate of 50.9%.

5.     Significant differences between those that required ADS following laminoplasty and those that did not were preoperative-PDS occupying ratio of OPLL (p=0.001) and postoperative-PDS cervical alignment (p=0.035).

6.     The most common symptoms that preluded ADS were severe unilateral pain in upper extremity (82%) and deterioration of cervical myelopathy (55%).

7.     Eight of 11 that required ADS had mixed, 2 had continuous, and 1 had segmental ossification, which was significantly different than the PDS only group (p=0.023).

Acharya et al. (2010)
Case Series
NInitial=24, NFinal=21
Intervention: Individuals were treated with cervical laminoplasty of C2-C6 using the Hirabayashi technique. Outcomes were assessed preoperative, operative, and postoperative at 2 wk, 6 mo, and 1 yr.

Outcome Measures: Hoffmann sign, Inverted brachioradialis reflex (IBR), Sustained clonus, Babinski, Hyperreflexia, Modified Japanese orthopedic association (JOA) score, Nurick scale, Recovery rate, t2 hyper-intensity.

1.     Preoperative, the sensitivity for detection of myelopathy by provocative signs from greatest to least were Babinski response (95%), IBR (91%), Hoffmann sign (86%), and sustained clonus (48%).

1.     The sensitivity for hyperreflexia preoperative were patella (95%), Achilles (90%), biceps (48%) and triceps (5%).

2.     At 1 yr, 38% presented with provocative signs (Hoffmann=38%, Babinski=5%, IBR=5%, clonus=5%).

3.     In regards to hyperreflexia, the lower limbs retained signs at 1 yr (patella=10%, Achilles=14%) whereas the upper limb did not at all (biceps/triceps=0%).

4.     Postoperative, recovery rate improved from 2 wk (28.6%) to 6 mo (60.7%) to 1 yr (61.3%). The mJOA and Nurick scale improved accordingly from 2 wks (10.38, 2.9) to 6 mo (13.29, 1.8) to 1 yr (13.4, 1.7).

5.     Of all individuals with radiologic presentation of t2 hyper-intensity on MRI, those with hypo intense cord signal had higher prevalence of Hoffmann sign (100% vs 80%), IBR (100% versus 87%), and Babinski sign (100% versus 93%) compared to normal cord hyper-intensity.



Various surgical techniques have been proposed for decompressing the injured spine. As discussed previously, the most common approach is to perform a laminectomy; however, in the cervical spine, another option is to perform a laminoplasty. This technique usually relies upon bone fragments or plate implants to mobilize the spinous processes and thus expand the spinal canal. Various groups have shown that in the appropriately selected individual population, laminoplasty is a reasonable alternative to laminectomy. There are no studies that compare similar subsets of patients undergoing laminoplasty or conservative management. There are no good studies comparing laminectomy to laminoplasty in patients with acute SCI.

  • There are no studies that compare similar subsets of patients undergoing laminoplasty or conservative management. There are no good studies comparing laminectomy to laminoplasty in patients with acute SCI.