• Craig Hospital Inventory of Environmental Factors (CHIEF) assesses the perceived impact of various types of environmental barriers. The CHIEF takes into account the type, frequency, and magnitude of problem resulting from these barriers.
  • The CHIEF contains 5 subscales: physical and structural barriers, attitudinal and support barriers, barriers to services and assistance, policy barriers, and barriers at work and school. A CHIEF short-form (CHIEF-SF) is also available, with 12 items.

ICF Domain

Environmental Factors ▶ Multiple

Administration

  • Self-report or interviewer
  • 10-15 minutes
  • There is also a short-form version with 12 items.

Number of Items

25 items

Equipment

None

Scoring

For each item, a frequency score (0-4), a magnitude score (1-2), and an impact score (product of the former two, 0-8) is obtained. Overall or subscale scores are the means of respective item impact scores

Languages

English and Hindi

Training Required

Does not require advanced training

Availability

The CHIEF worksheet can be found here.

Information regarding the CHIEF was provided by Craig Hospital. Please contact Cindy Harrison-Felix, PhD, at charrison-felix@craighospital.org  for more information.

Measurement Property Summary

Number of studies reporting psychometric properties: 3

Interpretability

  • MCID: not established in SCI population
  • SEM: 0.36
  • MDC: 0.99

(Hindi version; Soni et al. 2016; n=30, 26 males; 16 paraplegia, 14 tetraplegia; ASIA A-D; mean (SD) time post-SCI: 29.87 (25.68) months)

Typical Values

Mean (SD) Scores:

  • Physical and structural: 1.51 (0.92)
  • Attitude and support: 1.91 (0.95)
  • Services and assistance: 0.91 (0.68)
  • Policy: 1.17 (0.70)
  • Work and school: 1.50 (0.90)
  • Overall: 1.44 (0.82)

(Hindi version; Soni et al. 2016; n=30, 26 males; 16 paraplegia, 14 tetraplegia; ASIA A-D; mean (SD) time post-SCI: 29.87 (25.68) months)

Reliability – Moderate to High

Number of studies reporting reliability data: 2

  • High test-retest reliability overall: ICC = 0.930
  • Moderate to High internal consistency overall: α = 0.93

(Whiteneck et al. 2004a; n=409; mixed impairments, n=124 with SCI; no info on injury type or chronicity)

Validity

Number of studies reporting validity data: 2

NO RANKING:

  • Discriminant Validity: Total score, all items and subscales produced statistically significant differences across impairment groups. People with disabilities consistently reported higher overall level of barriers on all subscales and total CHIEF score than those without disabilities. People with severe disabilities generally scored higher on subscales and the total score than all people reporting any disability
  • Factory Analysis (N=2269):Principle components factor analysis created 5 factors/subscales, with 3-7 items each.
  • Content Validity:4 separate groups of subject matter experts produced 4 instruments representing common environmental factors. High consistency between groups allowed for authors to combine into one instrument.

(Whiteneck et al. 2004a; n=409; mixed impairments, n=124 with SCI; no info on injury type or chronicity)

Responsiveness

Not established in SCI population

Floor/Ceiling Effect

No values were reported for the presence of floor/ceiling effects for the SCI population.

Reviewers

Dr. Carlos L. Cano-Herrera, Tyra Chu

Date Last Updated

December 31, 2024

Soni S, Walia S, Noohu MM. Hindi translation and evaluation of psychometric properties of Craig Hospital Inventory of Environmental Factors instrument in spinal cord injury subjects. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2016;7(1):13-22.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26933338

Whiteneck G, Meade MA, Dijkers M, Tate DG, Bushnik T, Forchheimer MB. Environmental factors and their role in participation and life satisfaction after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(11):1793-803.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15520974

Whiteneck GG, Harrison-felix CL, Mellick DC, Brooks CA, Charlifue SB, Gerhart KA. Quantifying environmental factors: a measure of physical, attitudinal, service, productivity, and policy barriers. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(8):1324-35.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15295760