- Designed to measure the level of handicap in a community setting. Basically, CHART collects information on the degree to which the respondent fulfills the roles typically expected from people without disabilities.
- The CHART assesses ability in 6 domains:
A) Physical independence – the individual’s ability to sustain a customarily effective independent existence
B) Cognitive independence – the individual’s ability to sustain a customary level of independence without need of assistance
C) Mobility – the individual’s ability to move about effectively in his/her surroundings
D) Occupation – the individual’s ability to occupy time in the manner customary to that person’s sex, age and culture.
E) Social integration – the individual’s ability to participate in and maintain customary social relationships
F) Economic self-sufficiency – the individual’s ability to sustain customary socio-economic activity and independence - A short form (CHART-SF) has been developed; it has the same domains as the CHART.
Clinical Considerations
- The CHART is widely used, particularly in the U.S. National Spinal Cord Injury Database. However, questions on cognitive independence might be seen as irrelevant in SCI population.
- The economic self-sufficiency domain is based on US financial values and may not be applicable in other countries.
ICF Domain
Participation
Administration
- Patient-reported
- The questions can be answered in a quantifiable, behavioral terms (e.g. hours of physical assistance, how much time is someone with you to assist you, how many relatives do you visit, etc.)
- The scale takes up to 30 minutes for the CHART and up to 15 min for the CHART-SF
Number of Items
- CHART = 32
- CHART-SF = 19
Equipment
None
Scoring
- For each CHART dimension, a scoring procedure allows a score from 0 to 100 points, the latter being the maximum attainable corresponding to a role fulfillment equivalent to that of most individuals without disabilities
- For more detailed scoring instructions, refer to the CHART manual (see “Availability”).
Languages
English, Spanish, Japanese, Chinese, Persian, Korean, and Italian.
Training Required
No formal training required. However, reading the manual (https://craighospital.org/uploads/CraigHospital.CHARTManual.pdf) is recommended.
Availability
# of studies reporting psychometric properties: 13
Interpretability
- Typical values:
- Mean (SD) Scores for CHART:
Physical Independence = 93 (12)
Mobility = 77 (25.9)
Occupation = 56.8 (39.6)
Social Integration = 76.4 (24.7)
Economic Self-Sufficiency = 75.5 (28.1)
Total = 378.7 (86.8)
(Tozato et al. 2005: Japanese version; n=293, n=246 males; chronic SCI) - Mean (SD) Scores for CHART-SF:
Physical Independence = 47.0 (44.2)
Cognitive Independence = 66.5 (36.4)
Mobility = 69.6 (30.7)
Occupation = 38.3 (39.4)
Social Integration = 72.8 (35.2)
Economic Self-Sufficiency = 38.4 (33.2)
Total = 332.6 (145.8)
(Gontkovsky et al. 2009: n=28; 21 males; 90% traumatic SCI; 68% incomplete, 32% complete; ASIA A-D; level of injury: cervical, thoracic, lumbar; chronic SCI)
- Mean (SD) Scores for CHART:
- Total scores can be a misleading assessment of handicap, thus the use of subscales is recommended
MCID: not established for SCI
SEM: CHART SEM and MDC calculated from Tozato et al. 2005:
Domain | SEM (calculated from data in this article) | MDC (calculated from data in this article) |
---|---|---|
Physical independence | 8.2 | 22.8 |
Mobility | 5.2 | 14.4 |
Occupation | 14.8 | 41.1 |
Social integration | 11.6 | 32.1 |
Economy | 0 | 0 |
CHART-J total score | 40.7 | 112.9 |
MDC: CHART MDC = 53.3 between Time 1 (6 weeks post-discharge from inpatient rehabilitation) and Time 2 (1 year post-discharge)
(De Wolf et al. 2010; n=58; 45 males; traumatic SCI; 25 paraplegia, 33 tetraplegia; ASIA A-D; data collected at 6 weeks and 1 year post-discharge from inpatient rehab)
Reliability
- Test re-test reliability is High (r = 0.87 to 0.93) for the CHART total score
- Proxy values are High or Moderate for all domains except cognitive independence (ICC = 0.34, ‘poor’ rating) for the CHART
(Whiteneck 1992; n=135; 113 males; 41 complete quadriplegia; 38 incomplete quadriplegia, 42 complete paraplegia, 14 incomplete paraplegia; 2-35 years post-injury living in the community)
(Cusick 2001; n=983 + their proxies; 560 males; SCI (n=224) and other disabilities, community living)
(Walker et al. 2003; N SCI = 236, 75% male)
- Low Internal Consistency for the CHART-SF:
- Physical Independence: Cronbach’s alpha = 0.385
- Mobility: Cronbach’s alpha = 0.236
- Occupation: Cronbach’s alpha = 0.293
- Cognitive Independence: Cronbach’s alpha = 0.562
- Social Integration: Cronbach’s alpha = 0.351
(Golhasani-Keshtan et al. 2013; Persian version of CHART-SF; n=52; 52 males; mean age 49.3 years; 46 paraplegia, 6 tetraplegia)
Validity
- CHART domains and total score are able to differentiate groups based on:
- Level of handicap
- Gender
- Age
- Time since injury
- Domains social integration and economic self-sufficiency did not differentiate groups based on injury factors.
- Correlations between the CHART total score range from High for the SPRS (r=0.72) to Moderate for the CIM (r=0.47)
- Correlation between the CHART-SF total and the Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ) is High (r=0.79)
- Significant sensitivity to change to the CHART was reported (P=.002) of 408.2±50.1 for Time 1, 431.6±57.4 for Time 2.
(De Wolf et al. 2010; n=58; 45 males; traumatic SCI; 25 paraplegia, 33 tetraplegia; ASIA A-D; data collected at 6 weeks and 1 year post-discharge from inpatient rehab)
(Dijkers 1999; n=2183, n=1766 males, n=417 females; records from the National SCI database)
(Hall et al. 1998; n=1998, 81.5% males; tetraplegia and paraplegia)
(Masedo et al. 2005; n=84; 67 males; level of injury: cervical, thoracic, and lumbar/sacral; mean time since injury (SD): 13.96 (9.36) years)
(Tozato et al. 2005: Japanese version; n=293, n=246 males; chronic SCI)
(Whiteneck 1992; n=135; 113 males; 41 complete quadriplegia; 38 incomplete quadriplegia, 42 complete paraplegia, 14 incomplete paraplegia; 2-35 years post-injury living in the community)
Responsiveness
No values were reported for the responsiveness of the CHART for the SCI population.
Floor/Ceiling Effect
- No floor effects reported for CHART or CHART-SF.
- Ceiling effects for CHART were reported only for the Social integration and Cognitive Independence subscales.
(De Wolf et al. 2010; n=58; 45 males; traumatic SCI; 25 paraplegia, 33 tetraplegia; ASIA A-D; data collected at 6 weeks and 1 year post-discharge from inpatient rehab)
Reviewers
Dr. Ben Mortenson, Tyra Chu, Dr. Carlos L. Cano-Herrera
Date Last Updated
31 December 2024
Cusick C, Brook C, Whiteneck G. The Use of Proxies in Community Integration Research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:1018-1024.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11494179
Dijkers MPJM. Correlates of life satisfaction among persons with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1999; 80:867-76.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10453761
Golhasani-keshtan F, Ebrahimzadeh MH, Fattahi AS, Soltani-moghaddas SH, Omidi-kashani F. Validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Persian version of Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique (CHART) short form. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(22):1909-14.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23480647
Gontkovsky ST, Russum P, Stokic DS. Comparison of the CIQ and CHART short form in assessing community integration in individuals with chronic spinal cord injury: A pilot study. NeuroRehabilitation 2009; 24:185-192.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19339757
Hall KM; Dijkers M; Whiteneck G; Brooks CA; Krause JS. The Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique. Top spinal cord inj rehabil. 1998 Summer; 4(1): 16-30.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1310/V5RU-FRFE-50E6-E2NA
Johnston MV, Diab ME, Kim SS, Kirshblum S. Health literacy, morbidity, and quality of life among individuals with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2005;28(3):230-40.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16048141
Masedo AI, Hanley M, Jensen MP, Ehde D, Cardenas DD. Reliability and validity of a self-report FIM (FIM-SR) in persons with amputation or spinal cord injury and chronic pain. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2005;84:167-176.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15725790
Masedo AI, Hanley M, Jensen MP, Ehde D, Cardenas DD. Reliability and validity of a self-report FIM (FIM-SR) in persons with amputation or spinal cord injury and chronic pain. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;84(3):167-76.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15725790
Middleton JW, Tate RL, Geraghty TJ. Self-Efficacy and Spinal Cord Injury: Psychometric Properties of a New Scale. Rehabil Psychol. 2003; 48(4):281-288
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0090-5550.48.4.281
Tozato F, Tobimatsu Y, Wang CW, Iwaya T, Kumamoto K, Ushiyama T. Reliability and validity of the Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique for Japanese individuals with spinal cord injury. Tohoku J Exp Med, 2005; 205: 357-366.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15750332
Whiteneck G, Charlifue S, Gerhart K, Overholser J, Richardson G. Quantifying handicap: a new measure of long-term rehabilitation outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992;73:519-526.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1622299
de Wolf A, Lane-Brown A, Tate RL, Middleton J, Cameron ID. Measuring community integration after spinal cord injury: validation of the Sydney psychosocial reintegration scale and community integration measure. Qual Life Res, 2010; 19: 1185-1193.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20582722
World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 1980.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19537677