Welcome to SCIRE Professional

Effect of FES on OH in SCI

The application of FES triggers intermittent muscle contractions that activate the physiologic muscle pump. The physiologic muscle pump facilitates venous return via compression of the superficial and deep veins of the legs.

Table 8: FES on OH in SCI

Author Year; Country
Research Design
Total Sample Size
Faghri & Yount 2002;





Population: 7 subjects with paraplegia, 7 with tetraplegia; 4 incomplete and 10 complete injuries; 15 able-bodied controls.

Treatment: Random order of standing with or without FES (30 mins) for SCI subjects; voluntary tiptoe contractions during 30 minutes standing for able-bodied subjects.

Outcome Measures: Hemodynamics during supine-sitting-30 min standing.

1.  Significant reductions (up to 10%) in BP measures for SCI subjects from sitting to passive standing; but minimal changes when moving to FES standing.

2.  After 30 min of passive standing there was a reduction in stroke volume and cardiac output.

3.  After 30 min of FES standing, the pre-standing hemodynamics were maintained except for a significant reduction in SV.

Elokda et al. 2000;





Population: 2 subjects with tetraplegia, 3 with paraplegia; all complete injuries; 2-4 weeks post-injury.
Treatment: Tilt table – 6 minutes at each tilt angle (0, 15, 30, 45 and 60 degrees), with 4 minutes of recovery between each, with or without bilateral ankle plantar flexor and knee extensor electrical stimulation. Application order or absence of functional neuromuscular stimulation (FNS) was counterbalanced.Outcome Measures: HR, BP, perceived exertion.
1.  At tilt angles of 15, 30, 45 and 60 degrees, systolic BP was significantly lower when FNS was not applied compared to when it was administered, and it was more marked with increasing tilt angles.

2.  There was a progressive decrease in BP with increasing tilt angle and this increase was less pronounced in the FNS condition.

3.  Post hoc analysis showed that HR was significantly higher with FNS compared to without FNS at 60 degrees tilt.

Effect Sizes: Forest plot of standardized mean differences (SMD ± 95%C.I.) as calculated from pre- and post-intervention data.

Sampson et al. 2000;





Population: Motor complete SCI (lesions above T6); 3 with recent injury, 3 with long standing injury

Treatment: With and without lower-extremity FES while tilted by 10º increments every 3 minutes, from 0-90º with varying intensities of stimulation.

Outcome Measures: BP, HR, perceived syncope score.

1.  HR increased for both groups with increasing incline angle.  Mean diastolic BP was lower for the recent SCI subjects (105 mmHg) compared with chronic (123 mmHg).

2.  Systolic and diastolic BP increased with increasing FES stimulation intensities and BP decreased with increasing incline angle of tilt regardless of the site of stimulation.

3.  Subjects tolerated higher angles of incline with FES than without. The higher the intensity of FES, regardless of stimulation site, the greater the tilt incline tolerated.

Craven et al. 2013;




Population: 6 SCI subjects (C3-T9); Lesion grade: 3 complete (cSCI), 3 incomplete (iSCI); 22±4 years; range 18-25), iSCI 50±6; range 44-54); duration of injury: cSCI 18±3 years; range 16-21, iSCI 32±20 years; range 9-46).

Treatment: Three experimental sessions (passive, active and FES-assisted) using a Robotic Assisted Tilt-Table (RATT); five phases of testing protocol for each session (phase 1&2: body positioning; phase 3: robotic orthoses with full guidance force; phase 4a: reduced guidance force for robotic orthoses, increased volitional effort; phase 4b: added FES to augment volitional force).

Outcome measures: Oxygen uptake, respiratory exchange ratio (RER), minute ventilation, heart rate (HR), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP).

1.  Head-up tilt (HUT) tolerated well; no instances of hypotension or autonomic dysreflexia.

2.  Incomplete (iSCI) subjects: no change in oxygen uptake, respiratory exchange ratio (RER), minute ventilation, or heart rate (HR) in the first three testing phases; volitional participation in the stepping cycle and addition of functional electrical stimulation (FES) (phase 4a and b) led to significant ­ in oxygen uptake, Respiratory exchange ratio (RER), minute ventilation, and HR; no significant change in mean arterial pressure (MAP).

3.  Complete (cSCI) subjects: small statistically significant ­ in minute ventilation.

4.  iSCI and cSCI subjects: no difference in RER, minute ventilation, or HR response between groups in the first three testing phases. During phase 4b oxygen uptake, minute ventilation, and HR of iSCI subjects was significantly larger than cSCI subjects. MAP was significantly larger across all phases for iSCI subjects.

Yoshida et al. 2013; Canada



Population: 10 SCI adults (C4-T7); 44±11 years; range 27-59; AIS: A (n=5), B (n=3), C (n=1), D (n=1); duration of injury: 10±9 years; range 2-29.

Treatment: During head-up tilt (HUT) subjects underwent four 10 min conditions in random sequence: 1) no intervention 2) passive stepping 3) isometric functional electrical stimulation (FES) of leg muscles 4) FES of leg muscles combined with passive stepping (dynamic FES).

Outcome measures: Blood pressure (BP), heart rate, stroke volume, systemic vascular resistance, EMG signals of leg muscles, cross-sectional area of the inferior vena cava.

1.  Incidents of OH during tests (based on changes in BP of subjects): 6 during head-up tilt (HUT), 5 during passive stepping, 4 during isometric FES, 3 during dynamic FES. Despite this, no participants reported perceived symptoms of OH during the experiments.

2.  FES and passive stepping independently mitigated a ¯ in stroke volume and helped maintain mean BP.

3.  Effects of FES on stroke volume and mean BP were greater during passive stepping. FES and passive stepping combined didn’t interfere with each other but did not synergistically ­ stroke volume or mean BP.

Chao & Cheing 2005;




Population: Motor complete tetraplegia

Treatment: Progressive HUT maneuver with and without the FES to 4 muscle groups.

Outcome Measures: BP, HR, perceived presyncope score.

1.   Increasing tilt angle without FES significantly reduced systolic and diastolic BP and increased HR.

2.   Adding FES to HUT significantly attenuated the drop in systolic BP by 3.7±1.1 mmHg, the drop in diastolic BP by 2.3±0.9 mmHg, and HR increased by 1.0±0.5 beats/min for every 15 degrees increment in the tilt angle.

3.   FES increased the overall mean standing time by 14.3±3.9 min.

Raymond et al. 2001; Australia

Prospective controlled trial


Population: 8 male subjects with complete paraplegia, 8 male able-bodied controls.

Treatment: Lower-body negative pressure (LBNP) was used to provide the orthostatic challenge. Subjects were evaluated: (1) during supine rest, (2) supine rest with submaximal arm crank exercises (ACE), (3) ACE+LBNP, and (4) ACE+LBNP+leg electrical stimulation (ES). Able-bodied controls participated in the first 3 trial only.

Outcome measures: HR, stroke volume, cardiac output.

1.  ES increased stroke volume from ACE+LBNP to ACE+LBNP+ES condition for SCI group.

2.  ES did not affect oxygen uptake or cardiac output in the SCI group.

Faghri et al. 2001;


Prospective controlled trial


Population: 7 subjects with tetraplegia, 7 with paraplegia; 4 incomplete and 10 complete injuries.

Treatment: FES augmented standing (active) and non-FES standing (passive), for 30min duration; tests were separated by at least 24 hours.

Outcome Measures: Hemodynamics.

1. BP changed 8-9% when moving from sitting to passive standing (no FES).

2. The augmented FES condition prevented BP change when moving from sitting to standing.


Faghri et al. 1992;




Population: 6 subjects with paraplegia (T4-T10); 7 subjects with tetraplegia (C4-C7).

Treatment: FES-leg cycle ergometer (FES-LCE) training, 3X/week, for about 12 weeks (36 sessions).

Outcome Measures: Oxygen uptake, pulmonary ventilation (VE), respiratory exchange ratio (RER), BP, HR, stroke volume (SV) and cardiac output (Q).

1.  After training, resting HR and systolic BP were increased in subjects with tetraplegia but were reduced in subjects with paraplegia.

2.  In both groups, HR and BP during submaximal exercise significantly decreased and stroke volume and cardiac output significantly increased after training.

3.  These results suggest that FES-LCE training improves peripheral muscular and central cardiovascular fitness in SCI subjects.

Davis et al.1990;



Population: 12 males subjects with, paraplegia (T5-L2); FES Group, n=6; Non-FES (Control) group, n=6.

Treatment: Sub-maximal and maximal arm-crank exercise with or without FES of paralyzed leg muscles.

Outcome Measures: Peak VO2, expired ventilation (VE), perceived exertion respiratory exchange ratio (RER), BP, HR, resting stroke volume (SV) and cardiac output (Q), total peripheral resistance.

1.  No significant differences between the FES and Control groups in terms of peak VO2 (2.09 l/min), maximal HR, VE, respiratory exchange ratio and perceived exertion.

2.  No differences in power output or VO2 during peripheral FES application but stroke volume and Q were higher during the FES- induced leg contractions on subjects that demonstrated visible isometric contractions. Neither rest nor exercise HR was significantly influenced by lower limb FES. Increase of peripheral and overall ratings of perceived exertion.

3.  HR, SV and Q were not significantly altered at rest or during hybrid exercise in Control group. Decrease of peripheral and overall ratings of perceived exertion.

4.  No changes in BP, impedance indexes of myocardial contractility and differentiated subjective ratings of perceived exertion during hybrid exercise compared with non-FES conditions.


FES may be an important treatment adjunct to minimize cardiovascular changes during postural orthostatic stress in individuals with SCI. Several studies have suggested that FES-induced contractions of the leg muscles increases cardiac output and stroke volume, which increases venous return (Raymond et al. 2001). Subsequently, this increases ventricular filling and left ventricular end-diastolic volume (i.e., enhanced cardiac preload). According to the Frank-Starling effect, an increase in ventricular preload will lead to greater stretch of the myocytes and a concomitant increase in left ventricular stroke volume. The increased stroke volume may produce greater cardiac output and in turn, greater arterial blood pressure. In this manner, FES-induced contraction of the leg muscles may attenuate the drop in systolic BP in response to an orthostatic challenge.

FES-induced contraction of the leg muscles may also restore the body’s ability to redistribute blood from below the level of the lesion back to the heart.In fact, it is through this means that Davis et al. (1990) attributes FES’s effectiveness during an orthostatic challenge. In their study, Davis et al. found FES of leg muscles resulted in increased cardiac output and stroke volume in 6 males with paraplegia performing maximal arm-crank exercise. These results suggest that FES of leg muscles could alleviate the lower limb pooling effect during the orthostatic challenge. Chi et al. (2008) suggest that alleviation of the pooling effect could be further enhanced when FES of leg muscles is combined with passive mobilization. The clinical utility of this combination must be examined further in subjects with SCI because subjects in Chi et al. (2008) were able-bodied. A cross-sectional study by Yoshida et al. (2013) compares isometric FES of leg muscles vs. passive stepping vs. isometric FES + passive stepping. They found that both FES and passive stepping increased stroke volume and mean BP and that the highest increase in these two resulted from combined FES + stepping; however, the two interventions did not interact to synergistically increase stroke volume and mean aBP.

FES results in a dose-dependent increase in BP independent of the stimulation site that may be useful in treating OH (Sampson et al. 2000) andmay be an important treatment adjunct to minimize cardiovascular changes during postural orthostatic stress in individuals with acute SCI. Three level 2RCTs (Faghri & Yount 2002; Elokda et al. 2000; Sampson et al. 2000) and five non-randomized controlled trials (Chao & Cheing 2005; Raymond et al. 2001; Faghri et al. 2001; Faghri et al. 1992; Davis et al. 1990) with small sample sizes provide support for use of FES in individuals with SCI. FES of the lower extremity could be used by persons with SCI as an adjunct during standing to prevent OH and circulatory hypokinesis. An FES-induced leg muscle contraction is an effective adjunct treatment to delay OH caused by tilting; it allows people with tetraplegia to stand up more frequently and for longer durations (Elokda et al. 2000; Sampson et al. 2000).This effect may be more beneficial to those with tetraplegia who have a greater degree of decentralized cardiovascular autonomic control and may not be able to adjust their hemodynamics to the change in position (Faghri et al. 2001).

[su_spoiler title=”Effect Size Forest Plots of RCTs with Available Data” style=”fancy”][su_row]Click on the image to enlarge[/su_row]
[su_lightbox type=”image” src=”/wp-content/uploads/Forest_OH_Elokda_2000.gif”][image_with_animation image_url=”/wp-content/uploads/Forest_OH_Elokda_2000.gif” alt=”Effect size SMD forest plot for Elokda et al. 2000, functional electrical neuromuscular stimulation”][/su_lightbox]

Current protocols predominantly evaluate BP after a single application of FES with a single change in position. The feasibility and practicality of implementing FES to influence orthostatic BP over time needs to be further explored.


There is level 2 evidence (from small, lower quality RCTs) (Faghri & Yount 2002; Elokda et al. 2000; Sampson et al. 2000) that FES is an important treatment adjunct to minimize cardiovascular changes during postural orthostatic stress in individuals with SCI.

The use of FES is an effective adjunct treatment to minimize cardiovascular changes during changes in position.