Developed to assess the complex activities of daily living (ADLs) for older adults living in the community. It assesses a person’s ability to perform tasks such as using a telephone, doing laundry, and handling finances.
Each ability measured by the scale relies on either cognitive or physical function, though all require some degree of both.
can be administered using self-report or by interview.
The patient or a family member or caregiver may provide answers.
Responses to each of the eight items in the scale will vary ranging from independence in performing the activity to not performing the activity at all.
Approximately 10 minutes is required for administration.
Responses range from 0 ‘unable or partially able’ to 1 ‘able’.
Individual items are summed to give a total score.
MCID: not established SEM: not established MDC: not established
Item responses are summed to derive a scale score with higher scores indicating great independence.
No normative data has been established for the SCI population
Published data is available to compare results for individuals with SCI (see interpretability section of Study Details sheet).
No special training required.
May use with permission of publisher (Gerontological Society of America). Found here. (https://www.abramsoncenter.org/media/1197/instrumental-activities-of-daily-living.pdf)
The IADL is an easy to administer and provides various response options for each item enabling flexibility when scoring. It measures more complex (instrumental) levels of functioning than other ADL instruments. The IADL scale is therefore likely to be more sensitive in detecting earlier, less severe dysfunction.
The content of IADL measures often reflects specific cultural concerns. For example, British measures frequently include the ability to make a cup of tea. There is also potential for gender bias as the scale may overemphasize tasks customarily performed by women and thus overestimate dependency in men.
Only one study, with findings of weak construct validity, has been performed to test the IADL psychometric properties among an SCI population
Andresen EM, Fouts BS, Romeis JC, Brownson CA. Performance of health-related quality-of-life instruments in a spinal cord injured population. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1999; 80: 877-84. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10453762
Lawton G, Lundgren-Nilsson A, Biering-Sorensen F, Tesio L, Slade A, Penta M, Grimby G, Ring H, Tennant A. Cross-cultural validity of FIM in spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2006; 44: 746-752. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16389268