- ADAPSS primary scale assesses ‘an individual’s initial evaluation of an event or situation’. Its secondary scale assesses ‘an individual’s evaluation of their own coping resources, the possibility of these resources being adequate, and the likelihood that these resources can be employed effectively’.
- The scale consists of 6 subscales:
1) Fearful Despondency
2) Overwhelming Disbelief
3) Determined Resolve
4) Growth and Resilience
5) Negative Perceptions of Disability
6) Personal Agency - A short-form version was introduced in 2009 by Dean and Kennedy (Dean and Kennedy 2009).
Clinical Considerations
- Appraisals are important psychosocial variables in SCI populations as they have been found to be good predictors of emotional adjustment. The ADAPSS is useful in the clinical setting to better understand the appraisals which are significant for adjustment to SCI and thus to tailor treatment programs for patients.
- The ADAPSS is a SCI-specific appraisal scale. The questions are straightforward and the scale covers a range of appraisal themes.
- A self-administered format is recommended but an interviewer or proxy could be used in the case of severe physical disability. The assessment seems easy to administer and score.
ICF Domain
Body Function ▶ General Functions
Administration
- Patient-reported; self-administered questionnaire
- Participants are asked to rate their agreement/disagreement with the statements on a Likert Scale.
Number of Items
- Original version: 33 items
- Short-form version: 6 items
Equipment
None
Scoring
For both versions, scores range from 1 (strongly disagree) to 6 (strongly agree).
For specific instructions about the scoring algorithm, see the ADAPPS worksheet or visit https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/127XKXU3eerOmEDI25cG2es8YGknHsfQ7
Languages
English
Training Required
Does not require advanced training
Availability
Measurement Property Summary
Number of studies reporting psychometric properties: 8
Interpretability
- High scores on the Fearful Despondency, Overwhelming Disbelief, and Negative Perceptions of Disability subscales represent greater agreement with the appraisals; respondents with higher scores on these subscales are more likely to appraise their injury in terms of loss and threat and to perceive their injury as unmanageable.
- Low scores on the Determined Resolve, Growth and Resilience, and Personal Agency subscales represent greater agreement with the appraisals (though the range of scores is not provided). Respondents with lower scores on these subscales were more likely to appraise their injury in terms of loss and threat and to perceive their injury as unmanageable.
- The correlation between injury level and the ADAPPS-sf total score are low (β value = 0.153 [p<0.051])
(Mignogna et al. 2014; n=98; 94 males, 4 females; mean (SD) age: 18.3 (13.1) years; tetraplegia (low): n=14, tetraplegia (high, AIS A,B,C): n=6, AIS D: n=41; traumatic injury: yes (77), no (21))
- Threshold values: Research has suggested cut-off scores for the ADAPSS-sf ranging from ≥22 to ≥27; indicating catastrophic negative based on 85th percentile cutoff.
(Eaton et al. 2018; n=371; 261 males, 110 females; non-traumatic and traumatic; injury level: Cervical-sacral; AIS A-D)
(Deane et al. 2020; n=115; age: 18 years or younger at time of SCI, initially interviewed at age 19 or older, and followed annually)
- MCID: not established in SCI population
- SEM: not established in SCI population
- MDC: not established in SCI population
Typical Values
Mean scores reported for the ADAPSS-sf have varied from 13.94 to 19.21 (SD = 6.10-7.44)
(Eaton et al. 2018; n=371; 261 males, 110 females; non-traumatic and traumatic; injury level: Cervical-sacral; AIS A-D)
(Mignogna et al. 2014; n=98; 94 males, 4 females; mean (SD) age: 18.3 (13.1) years; tetraplegia (low): n=14, tetraplegia (high, AIS A,B,C): n=6, AIS D: n=41; traumatic injury: yes (77), no (21))
(Dean et al. 2020; n=115; age: 18 years or younger at time of SCI, initially interviewed at age 19 or older, and followed annually)
(McDonald et al. 2018; n=262; 92% males; median age: 59 years; traumatic and non-traumatic SCI; 51% AIS D; paraplegia and tetraplegia)
Mean (SD) scores reported for the ADAPSS long form subscales are:
- Fearful Despondency: 31.27 (9.43).
- Overwhelming Disbelief: 13.18 (5.32)
- Determined Resolve: 8.36 (3.82)
- Growth and Resilience: 12.32 (4.79)
- Negative Perceptions of Disability: 17.59 (5.89)
- Personal Agency: 12.05 (4.37)
(Kennedy et al. 2016; n=44; 37 males, 7 females; mean age: 33.3 years; level of injury: 46% cervical, 34% thoracic, and 20% lumbar; AIS level: 60% complete and 40% incomplete injuries; mean (range) time since injury: 23.1 (21-24) years; 22/44 participants were deceased)
Reliability – High
Number of studies reporting reliability data: 3
- High internal consistency for the ADAPSS subscales:
- Personal Agency: α=.70
- Fearful Despondency: α= .85
- High test-retest reliability for the ADAPSS subscales: α=.74-.86
(Dean & Kennedy 2009; n=237; 162 males, 75 females; mean age = 47 (range: 18-81); tetraplegia: 37%, paraplegia: 56%, unknown: 7%)
Validity – Low to High
Number of studies reporting validity data: 4
- Low to Moderate correlation between the Perceived Manageability Scale – Needs Assessment Checklist and the following ADAPSS subscales:
- Fearful Despondency: ρ=-.597
- Overwhelming Disbelief: ρ=-.468
- Determined Resolve: ρ=-0.599
- Growth and Resilience: ρ=-.345
- Negative Perceptions of Disability: ρ=-.533
- Personal Agency: ρ=-.519
- Moderate correlation between the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale – Anxiety subscale and the ADAPSS Fearful Despondency subscale: ρ=.649 (p<.01)
- Low to Moderate correlation between the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale – Anxiety subscale and the ADAPSS subscales:
- Overwhelming Disbelief: ρ=.597 (p<.01)
- Determined Resolve: ρ=.347 (p<.01)
- Negative Perceptions of Disability: ρ=.496 (p<.01)
- Personal Agency: ρ=.393 (p<.01)
- Low correlation between the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale – Anxiety subscale and the ADAPSS Growth and Resilience subscale: ρ=.187 (p<.01)
(Dean & Kennedy 2009; n=237; 162 males, 75 females; mean age = 47 (range: 18-81); tetraplegia: 37%, paraplegia: 56%, unknown: 7%)
- High correlation between the ADAPPS-sf total score and life satisfaction: β value = -.72 (p< .001)
- Low correlation between the ADAPPS-sf total score and controlling for depressive symptoms: β value = .05 (p<.604)
(Mignogna et al. 2014; n=98; 94 males, 4 females; mean (SD) age: 18.3 (13.1) years; tetraplegia (low): n=14, tetraplegia (high, AIS A,B,C): n=6, AIS D: n=41; traumatic injury: yes (77), no (21))
- Low to Moderate correlation between all subscales of appraisals of disability and all the subscales of the Multidimensional Acceptance of Loss Scale and the Heartland Forgiveness Scale: r = -0.244 to -0.647 (p < 0.01)
(Byra et al. 2020; n=163; 100 males, 63 females; mean (SD) age: 39.6 (9.38) years; injury level: 26 C1-C4 nonambulatory, 104 C5-C8 nonambulatory, 33 non-cervical, nonambulatory; mean time since injury: 12.05)
- Moderate to High correlation between the ADAPSS subscales and Beck Depression Inventory:
- Fearful despondency: r = .660, p = .001
- Overwhelming disbelief: r = .697, p = .001
- Determined resolve: r = .814, p = .001
- Negative perceptions of disability: r = .509, p = .016
- Personal agency: r = .627, p = .002).
(Kennedy et al. 2016; n=44; 37 males, 7 females; mean age: 33.3 years; level of injury: 46% cervical, 34% thoracic, and 20% lumbar; AIS level: 60% complete and 40% incomplete injuries; mean (range) time since injury: 23.1 (21-24) years; 22/44 participants were deceased)
Responsiveness
No values were reported for the responsiveness of the ADAPSS for the SCI population.
Floor/Ceiling Effect
No values were reported for the presence of floor/ceiling effects in the ADAPSS for the SCI population.
Reviewers
Dr. Vanessa Noonan, Dr. Carlos L. Cano-Herrera, Elsa Sun
Date Last Updated
December 31, 2024
Byra S, Mróz J, Kaleta K. Forgiveness and acceptance of disability in people with traumatic spinal cord injury-the mediating role of disability appraisal. A cross-sectional study. Spinal Cord. 2020 Dec;58(12):1317-1324. doi: 10.1038/s41393-020-0507-6.
Byra S, Mróz J, Kaleta K. Forgiveness and acceptance of disability in people with traumatic spinal cord injury-the mediating role of disability appraisal. A cross-sectional study. Spinal Cord. 2020 Dec;58(12):1317-1324. doi: 10.1038/s41393-020-0507-6.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32606359/
Dean RE, Kennedy P. Measuring Appraisals Following Acquired Spinal Cord Injury: A Preliminary Psychometric Analysis of the Appraisals of Disability. Rehabilitation Psychology 2009;54(2): 222-231.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19469614
Deane KC, Chlan KM, Vogel LC, Zebracki K. Use of Appraisals of DisAbility Primary and Secondary Scale-Short Form (ADAPSS-sf) in individuals with pediatric-onset spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2020;58(3):290-297
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31700146/
Eaton R, Jones K, Duff J. Cognitive appraisals and emotional status following a spinal cord injury in post-acute rehabilitation. Spinal Cord. 2018;56(12):1151-1157.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29895873/
Kennedy P, Kilvert A, Hasson L. A 21-year longitudinal analysis of impact, coping, and appraisals following spinal cord injury. Rehabil Psychol. 2016 Feb;61(1):92-101. doi: 10.1037/rep0000066.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26571348/
McDonald SD, Goldberg-Looney LD, Mickens MN, Ellwood MS, Mutchler BJ, Perrin PB. Appraisals of DisAbility Primary and Secondary Scale-Short Form (ADAPSS-sf): Psychometrics and association with mental health among U.S. military veterans with spinal cord injury. Rehabil Psychol. 2018;63(3):372-382.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30047748/
Mignogna J, Christie AJ, Holmes SA, Ames H. Measuring disability-associated appraisals for veterans with spinal cord injury. Rehabil Psychol. 2015;60(1):99-104.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25706194/
Russell M, Ames H, Dunn C, Beckwith S, Holmes SA. Appraisals of disability and psychological adjustment in veterans with spinal cord injuries. J Spinal Cord Med. 2021 Nov;44(6):958-965. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32406809/