Tunk’s Classification Scheme

Download Clinical Summary PDF

Tool Description

  • Identifies 11 types of pain for those with spinal cord injury according to the lesion level.

Above the lesion level

At the lesion level

Below the lesion level

1) Myofacial

2) Syringomyelia

3) Non spinal cord

 

4) Radicular

5) Hyperalgesic border reaction

6) Fracture

7) Myofacial (incomplete lesion)

8) Diffuse burning

9) Phantom

10) Visceral

11) Myofacial (incomplete lesion)

ICF Domain:

Body Function – Subcategory: Sensory Functions

Number of Items:

n/a

Brief Instructions for Administration & Scoring

Administration:

  • Clinician-administered; information is obtained through a semi-structured interview.
  • This pain classification allows the clinician to describe the general location and whether the pain differentiates between several types of pain.
  • Administration time is usually 15-20 minutes, but it may take longer for more complex cases.

Equipment: None.

Scoring: N/A.

Interpretability

MCID: not established for SCI
SEM: not established for SCI
MDC: not established for SCI

Languages:

n/a

Training Required:

No formal training is required but knowledge about neuro-anatomy and physiology - specifically sensation and theories of pain is an asset. This system requires considerable knowledge from the clinician classifying the pain as well as from other health care professionals who may be using the information to help with pain management.

Availability:

Can be found in Putzke et al. 2002.

Clinical Considerations

  • The classification system does not follow a systematic method for acquiring the data from the patients, thus obtaining consistent information from one time to another or between individuals very difficult. This system is very clinician dependent as it requires considerable knowledge about the various origins of pain to be able to interpret the patient’s comments into the defined classification scheme.
  • Although this system has merit for giving more categories for which to describe the various types of pain an individual may have, it most likely would be useful for more complex pain cases where more time is allocated towards understanding the origins of the individual’s pain.

Measurement Property Summary

# of studies reporting psychometric properties: 1

Reliability:

  • Rate of agreement across all raters was 17%.

[Putzke et al. 2003]

Validity:

No values were reported for the validity of Tunk’s Classification Scheme for the SCI population.

Responsiveness:

No values were reported for the responsiveness of Tunk’s Classification Scheme for the SCI population.

Floor/ceiling effect:

No values were reported for the presence of floor/ceiling effects in the Tunk’s Classification Scheme for the SCI population.

Reviewer

Dr. Janice Eng, Christie Chan

Date Last Updated:

Feb 1, 2013

Download the measure

Download Worksheet:
Can be found in Putzke et al. 2002.

Video

n/a

Scoring

n/a

Equipment Needed

Tunk’s:

Putzke JD, Richards JS, Ness T, Kezar L. Interrater reliability of the International Association for the Study of Pain and Tunks' spinal cord injury pain classification schemes. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2003;82:437-440.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12820785

Tunks E. Pain in spinal cord injured patients. In: Bloch R, Basbaum M (ed). Management of Spinal Cord Injuries. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, MD, 1986: p 180-211.
http://scholar.google.ca/scholar?hl=en&q=Pain+in+spinal+cord+injured+patients+tunks&btnG=&as_sdt=1%2C5&as_sdtp=